Web Courseworks Home

Converting face-to-face workshops

Spring is finally here—and it usually means a busy period for eLearning developers who are productively delivering on 1st quarter promises. I have been following Clive Shepard and Elliot Masie’s posts on the economic condition in the training and development field. Both report a promising outlook for eLearning compared with face to face training.

We are receiving several jobs and inquiries for converting face-to-face workshops (one or two day events) into mostly asynchronous eLearning seminars/ courses/ eWorkshops. Not quite sure what to call this type of eLearning event, especially when it has an introductory synchronous activity.

Some of the good ideas that I’ve heard passed around include:

  • What you call it depends on the market. Professors seem to like the term “seminar” as opposed to “course” since eCourse seems to imply a semester’s worth of education.
  • Keep the asynchronous eCourse “time dependent” even if you don’t have to. Give adult learners a window in which the learning and assignments must take place.  Three weeks of access being equivalent to a one day workshop works for me.
  • The first hour should be a live web conference that teaches how to use the technology and focuses on the workload/workshop expectations.
  • Make sure all assignments have relevancy to the learner’s job.
  • Work at making discussion threads (Web 2.0 anyone?) important to the learner by requiring them to post something they are working on and to post a related question.
  • Pick instructors who will increase attendance and promote them as stars.
  • Require instructors to post comments in discussion threads.

Please share your thoughts...


How about using the term

How about using the term "certification" in the terminology (when appropriate, of course). This differentiates merely attending/viewing a program (whatever it's called) from showing evidence of completion/comprehension.

How about using the term

How about using the term "certification" in the terminology (when appropriate, of course). This differentiates merely attending/viewing a program (whatever it's called) from showing evidence of completion/comprehension.

John, your sophisticated

John, your sophisticated comments on interactivity are very helpful. We're hearing everyone (presentors and attendees alike) say they want more "interactivity" but no one knows just what that is, within practical constraints. Thanks!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Jon Aleckson

Jon Aleckson
eLearning Teacher & Entrepreneur

View Jon Aleckson's profile on LinkedIn
Add to Technorati Favorites
follow me on twitter
subscribe to RSS

eLearning Learning