Individuals with careers in eLearning often started out as educational technologists or programmers, writers or creative educators. Few of us started this career path with expertise in business, management, not to mention sales. Most of us just don’t get it when it comes to selling products and services—the schools of education or computer science certainly didn’t focus on instilling business acumen or sales expertise. Yet in the real world, most of us (in both non-profit groups and private sector teams) will have to pitch to prospects and prepare a proposal for a potential project.
Tom Searcy (of HuntBigSales) has built his career on how all of us have the capability to land big projects—even if the team is small and the potential project is a “whale.” His first book Whale Hunting is a 250 page epic on how to secure large accounts. His latest book RFPs SUCK! should be mandatory reading for everyone in your organization who is involved in preparing proposals or prospect presentations. The new book is succinct, well organized, and full of useful tips if you are tasked with either creating or responding to an RFP. If your job is to write the RFP, hopefully you can avoid the ten dumbest RFP questions. This book will at least give you a better understanding and empathy for what vendors must go through to answer RFPs.
The truth is that RFPs often do SUCK. For those of us in the private sector, the worst types of RFPs are the perfunctory ones, when the process is wired for the incumbent to win. The client or consultant already has a favorite vendor (and it’s not you), but they are required to solicit other bids. Tom addresses the characteristics of these “RFPs to avoid.”
Other useful parts in the book include:


This short “how-to” book will more than pay for itself, especially if you’re an eLearning manager looking to win your next big project.
And be sure to follow Tom Searcy's blog!
Jon - Thanks for highlighting the book. I'll have to check it out. Naturally, organizations have a responsibility to gather the information they need to make a good choice, but my experience over the years has been that traditional RFP processes rarely result in better choices. Most of them create an "us and them" dynamic from the get-go and ensure that the relationship will not be built on a foundation of trust. Many of the best vendors will actually not respond to RFPs both for this reason and because they know that so many RFPs are already wired for an incumbent, as you suggest. In other words, an RFP process often guarantees that an organization will not even end up talking to the vendors who are best qualified to help it. There are better ways to go about it (but that will have to be the subject of something longer than a blog comment!) - Jeff
P.S. - Here are my musings on RFPs from a while back:
http://www.jeffthomascobb.com/2007/06/a-modest-proposal-kill-the-rfp-part-i/